Coates goal well canceled – Observer


After Jhonata Robert’s free-kick equal to one minute from the end, the ball returned to the center of the field and Rúben Amorim signaled to Coates for forward to the offensive zone, in what would be a 4x2x3 to close a game where it was reduced to ten after the expulsion of Pedro Gonçalves and he still had little time to put himself at an advantage again. The kick-off was long, the Uruguayan jumped in the area, headed for 3-2, made the party with all the substitutes entering the field, Luís Godinho received VAR indication possible irregularity.

VAR cut off Pé de Feijão do João (the chronicle of Famalicão-Sporting)

Being a move over the 90th minute and being able to decide the game, the referee from the Évora Football Association went to the screen on the pitch, analyzed the move and interpreted the touch of the left arm of the lion captain on the Famalicão goalkeeper as lack, thus invalidating the goal that could have given Sporting the triumph and then, giving the order to expel Rúben Amorim for the protests in the green and white technical area.

“They canceled out a clean goal in the end. I’ve seen the move and I can’t see it missing. It is part but it is difficult to understand this decision ”, considered João Mário, in the area of ​​quick interviews. “I have not yet seen the repetition of the move, but on the field, for me, there was no lack,” said Rúben Amorim, at the press conference. “Again referee Luís Godinho [n.d.r. árbitro do Sporting-FC Porto da terceira jornada], we again had a referee at the VAR who is not the same but who had an influence at a key moment. I ask the same question again, and I will have the same answer: this final move to cancel the goal against Coates, with one of the rivals, Benfica or FC Porto, it would never be canceled. Never! In a football game there are normal errors, one or the other, what worries me is the nature and the way the VAR is seen, in the two games in which we lost points ”, started by saying Frederico Varandas.

“The goal is clean, they had to go to the VAR because it was necessary to cancel. There were four points, they started to shake… ”, accuses Varandas

“This Coates goal is clean, it’s a clean goal. Then what happens? We will use the VAR and we will try to find something that justifies being able to cancel the goal. It was necessary to put a microscopic camera, with a magnification of 64 times and we will see the intention, the touch of the arm and it is necessary to cancel the goal. I say it again: it would never be canceled with our rivals, ever! I am sorry, but as Sporting president it costs a lot to see four points taken away for misuse of the VAR. I am not talking about the debatable bids, this is a misuse of the VAR and that is what happened ”, added the Leon leader in a“ mixed zone ”, admitting that he has already spoken with the President of the Arbitration Council who has a similar opinion to his in relation to the VAR, “which has to be used for loud, clamorous moves”. “In this, the referee validates and is clean,” he added.

[Clique na imagem para ver o golo anulado a Coates em vídeo]

Source link by

*The article has been translated based on the content of Source link by
. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here